BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//CEFISES @ UCLouvain - ECPv6.18.3.1//NONSGML v1.0//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
X-WR-CALNAME:CEFISES @ UCLouvain
X-ORIGINAL-URL:http://cefises.be
X-WR-CALDESC:Events for CEFISES @ UCLouvain
REFRESH-INTERVAL;VALUE=DURATION:PT1H
X-Robots-Tag:noindex
X-PUBLISHED-TTL:PT1H
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:Europe/Brussels
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0200
TZNAME:CEST
DTSTART:20250330T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0200
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:CET
DTSTART:20251026T010000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0200
TZNAME:CEST
DTSTART:20260329T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0200
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:CET
DTSTART:20261025T010000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0200
TZNAME:CEST
DTSTART:20270328T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0200
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:CET
DTSTART:20271031T010000
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Brussels:20261002T140000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Brussels:20261002T160000
DTSTAMP:20261006T171541Z
CREATED:20260728T134143Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20261006T171541Z
UID:2673-1790949600-1790956800@cefises.be
SUMMARY:CEFISES Seminar: Guido Prieto\, "Are model organisms models?: A view from DEKI"
DESCRIPTION:Livestream  https://www.youtube.com/@CEFISES \nSeries: Models \nSpeaker: Guido I. Prieto (Bielefeld University & Institute for Studies of Science) \nTitle: Are model organisms models?: A view from DEKI \nAbstract \nMainstream philosophical accounts of model organism-based research either treat model organisms as models or make their status as models central to understanding whether and how they represent. In contrast\, in this talk I argue that model organisms are not models but model ‘carriers\,’ only abstracted and selected ‘parts’ of which are included in biological models that can be used to legitimately represent similar target phenomena in other organisms. To set up this argument\, I mobilize and refine the DEKI account of scientific representation\, and offer an integrated picture of how representation with model organisms works. Moreover\, I explain how my framework accommodates model organisms’ special epistemic place within the scientific landscape as highly versatile model carriers. Finally\, I show that my account satisfactorily reconstructs case studies from scientific practice and paves the way to reconcile opposing positions on the representational status of model organisms to build a more robust epistemology of model organism-based research.
URL:http://cefises.be/en/event/cefises-seminar-2-oct/
LOCATION:Salle Ladrière\, Place du Cardinal Mercier 14 (bâtiment Socrate\, a.124)\, Louvain-la-Neuve\, 1348\, Belgium
CATEGORIES:Models
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Brussels:20261009T140000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Brussels:20261009T160000
DTSTAMP:20261006T172123Z
CREATED:20260728T134258Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20261006T172123Z
UID:2676-1791554400-1791561600@cefises.be
SUMMARY:CEFISES Seminar: Rani Lill Anjum\, "Philosophical bias in science and medicine"
DESCRIPTION:Livestream  https://www.youtube.com/@CEFISES \nSeries: Medicine \nSpeaker: Rani Lill Anjum (Norwegian University of Life Sciences) \nTitle: Philosophical bias in science and medicine \nAbstract \nAll sciences come with a number of philosophical basic implicit assumptions\, what we call ‘philosophical bias’. Such biases are typically adopted tacitly through education and choice of scientific methods. When disciplines meet\, any tension in basic assumptions will represent a barrier for genuine interdisciplinarity. At NMBU we therefore teach our Master students about philosophical bias as part of their science education. In the CauseHealth project\, we have focused specifically on philosophical biases in medicine and health sciences\, specifically about complexity\, causality\, probability and risk.
URL:http://cefises.be/en/event/cefises-seminar-9-oct/
LOCATION:Salle Ladrière\, Place du Cardinal Mercier 14 (bâtiment Socrate\, a.124)\, Louvain-la-Neuve\, 1348\, Belgium
CATEGORIES:Medicine
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Brussels:20261016T140000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Brussels:20261016T160000
DTSTAMP:20261014T183529Z
CREATED:20260728T134406Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20261014T183529Z
UID:2679-1792159200-1792166400@cefises.be
SUMMARY:CEFISES Seminar: CANCELLED
DESCRIPTION:Livestream  https://www.youtube.com/@CEFISES \nSeries: Possibility \nCancelled
URL:http://cefises.be/en/event/cefises-seminar-16-oct/
LOCATION:Salle Ladrière\, Place du Cardinal Mercier 14 (bâtiment Socrate\, a.124)\, Louvain-la-Neuve\, 1348\, Belgium
CATEGORIES:Possibility
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Brussels:20261023T140000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Brussels:20261023T160000
DTSTAMP:20261018T074829Z
CREATED:20260728T134538Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20261018T074829Z
UID:2682-1792764000-1792771200@cefises.be
SUMMARY:CEFISES Seminar: Kévin Chalas\, "On the (ir)relevance of academic epistemic practices for emancipatory struggles"
DESCRIPTION:Livestream  https://www.youtube.com/@CEFISES \nSeries: Work-in-Progress \nSpeaker: Kévin Chalas (UCLouvain) \nTitle: On the (ir)relevance of academic epistemic practices for emancipatory struggles: A pragmatist analysis of the boundaries of sense within academic institutions \nAbstract \nSandra Harding opened her 1986 book\, The Science Question in Feminism\, by claiming that feminist studies of science had turned from a reformist call to improve the sciences by reflection on the situation of women within them toward a revolutionary stance that put into question the very possibility for the sciences to participate in any emancipatory struggles. Forty years later\, one has to admit that no revolution ever came to pass within academia: what could be recuperated from critical thoughts for the benefits of standard academia was; what couldn’t is still grossly marginalized. Yet\, it remains a common idea for progressive-minded academics that their epistemic practices may significantly contribute to the liberation of marginalized social classes and the fight against the return to power of fascist ideologies. In this presentation\, through a pragmatist analysis of academic practices and the way in which they construct meaning and knowledge\, I aim to argue that it is a misguided idea at best\, a counter-productive one at worst. In particular\, I argue that academic epistemic practices hinders emancipatory struggles through the capture of the means of knowledge production and their removal from the public sphere\, a fact already anticipated by Dewey in The Public and its Problems: « A class of experts is inevitably so removed from common interests as to become a class with private interests and private knowledge\, which in social matters is not knowledge at all. » I will end the talk with a discussion of ways to remediate this problem by taking inspiration from anarchist and Deweyan considerations regarding democracy and education.
URL:http://cefises.be/en/event/cefises-seminar-23-oct/
LOCATION:Salle Ladrière\, Place du Cardinal Mercier 14 (bâtiment Socrate\, a.124)\, Louvain-la-Neuve\, 1348\, Belgium
CATEGORIES:WIP
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR